Previous Page  36 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

Extended 5-Year Follow-up Results of a Phase 1b Study

(BRIM7) of Cobimetinib Combined With Vemurafenib in

BRAF

V600

-Mutated Melanoma

Adil Daud,

1

Anna C. Pavlick,

2

Antoni Ribas,

3

Rene Gonzalez,

4

Karl D. Lewis,

4

Omid Hamid,

5

Thomas F. Gajewski,

6

Igor Puzanov,

7

Jessie J. Hsu,

8

Isabelle Rooney,

8

Erica Park,

8

Grant A. McArthur

9

1

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;

2

New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA;

3

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA;

4

University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA;

5

The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA;

6

The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA;

7

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA;

8

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA;

9

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, and University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

INTRODUCTION

BRAF

V600

is the driver of a significant proportion of melanomas, and targeted inhibition of

MAPK signaling is effective in treating advanced melanoma

1,2

– However, relapses frequently occur due to re-activation of MAPK signaling through

acquired mutations in pathway components

3,4

Combining the BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) vemurafenib with the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib

has the potential to provide more effective tumor suppression

The phase Ib BRIM7 study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT01271803) evaluated the safety and

preliminary efficacy of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib

5

A subsequent randomized phase 3 trial showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful

improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of cobimetinib

combined with vemurafenib compared with vemurafenib alone

6

Extended follow-up of this study provides useful insights on the long-term safety and

efficacy of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib for patients with

BRAF

V600

-mutated

metastatic melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib

after extended follow up in patients with

BRAF

V600

-mutated metastatic melanoma (data cutoff

July 10, 2017)

METHODS

Study Design

BRIM7 was an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b dose-escalation study conducted in

two stages (dose escalation and expansion)

In the dose-escalation stage, patients received cobimetinib at 60, 80, or 100 mg once daily

(QD) for 14 days on/14 days off (14/14); 21 days on/7 days off (21/7); or continuously (28/0),

combined with vemurafenib at 720 or 960 mg twice daily (BID) continuously (

Figure 1

)

Two dose levels were expanded: cobimetinib (60 mg QD 21/7) and vemurafenib (720 and

960 mg BID)

Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal

of consent

Figure 1.

Study design.

Cobimetinib 60 mg QD

21/7 days on/off

+

Vemurafenib 720 mg BID

28/0 days on/off

Cohort Expansion Stage

(2 cohorts)

Dose Escalation Stage

3 + 3 design (10 cohorts)

Follow-up Period

(2 cohorts)

Cobimetinib 60, 80, or

100 mg QD

14/14, 21/7, or

28/0 days on/off

+

Vemurafenib 720 or

960 mg BID

28/0 days on/off

All patients

Cobimetinib 60 mg QD

21/7 days on/off

+

Vemurafenib 960 mg BID

28/0 days on/off

Prior

treatment

with

vemurafenib

n = 66

No prior

BRAFi

treatment

n = 63

BID, twice daily; BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; QD, once daily.

Key Eligibility Criteria

Efficacy

Confirmed BORR in BRAFi-naive patients and in Vem-PD patients was unchanged from

previous reports

7,8

(

Table 2

)

Table 2.

Confirmed BORR in Each Cohort

Vem-PD

n = 66

BRAFi-Naive

n = 63

Objective response, % (95% CI)

15.2 (7.5–25.5)

87.3 (76.7–94.4)

Complete response

1.5

19.0

Partial response

13.6

68.3

Stable disease

42.4

9.5

Progressive disease

36.4

3.2

Not assessable/not done

6.0

0

BORR, best overall response rate; BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

Median PFS for Vem-PD and BRAFi-naive patients remained unchanged from previous

reports, at 2.8 months and 13.8 months, respectively (

Figure 2

)

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS in (A) Vem-PD patients and

(B) BRAFi-naive patients.

100

80

60

40

0

20

BRAFi-naive

63 55 42 32 26 20 16 14 13 12 9

4

2

8 5

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

B

Events, n

45

MedianPFS,months (95%CI)

13.8 (10.8–20.6)

+

BRAFi-naive (n = 63)

Censored

100

80

60

40

0

20

Vemurafenib

progressors

64 15 7

2

2 2

1 1

1 1 —

— —

— —

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

A

Events, n

61

MedianPFS,months (95%CI)

2.8 (2.6–3.4)

+

Vemurafenib progressors (n = 66)

Censored

PFS,%

PFS,%

BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression-free survival; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

Median OS for BRAFi-naive patients increased from 31.2 months at 4 years’ follow-up

(data cutoff April 25, 2016)

8

to 31.8 months at the latest data cutoff (July 10, 2017),

while landmark OS rates reached a plateau at 39.2% (

Figure 3

and

Table 3

)

Median OS for Vem-PD patients remained unchanged from previous reports at 8.5 months,

and landmark OS rates were stable

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves for OS in (A) Vem-PD patients and (B) BRAFi-naive

patients.

100

80

60

40

20

OS,%

A

Events, n

53

MedianOS,months (95%CI)

8.5 (6.7–11.1)

+

Vemurafenib progressors (n = 66)

Censored

Table 5.

Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Attribution, in ≥20% of

Safety-Evaluable Patients, and AESI, in BRIM7 at 5 Years

Common Treatment-EmergentAEs, n (%)

Vem-PD

n = 66

BRAFi-Naive

n = 63

Any

Grade

Grade

≥3

Any

Grade

Grade

≥3

Non-acneiform rash

a

25 (38)

1 (2)

56 (89)

9 (14)

Diarrhea

31 (47)

2 (3)

52 (83)

6 (10)

Fatigue

18 (27)

1 (2)

46 (73)

7 (11)

Photosensitivity

a

22 (33)

1 (2)

46 (73)

1 (2)

Elevations in LFTs

a

22 (33)

4 (6)

44 (70)

13 (21)

Nausea

23 (35)

2 (3)

37 (59)

2 (3)

Arthralgia

8 (12)

1 (2)

31 (49)

7 (11)

Vomiting

14 (21)

1 (2)

30 (48)

0

CPK level elevation

10 (15)

1 (2)

30 (48)

2 (3)

Pyrexia

11 (17)

1 (2)

28 (44)

1 (2)

Acneiform rash

a

9 (14)

1 (2)

28 (44)

2 (3)

Peripheral edema

11 (17)

0

27 (43)

0

Anemia

11 (17)

5 (8)

23 (37)

7 (11)

Blood creatinine increased

6 (9)

0

21 (33)

1 (2)

Myalgia

4 (6)

0

20 (32)

1 (2)

Headache

13 (20)

0

19 (30)

2 (3)

Pruritus

7 (11)

0

19 (30)

1 (2)

Hypertension

6 (9)

1 (2)

19 (30)

5 (8)

Actinic keratosis

3 (5)

0

19 (30)

0

Decreased appetite

14 (21)

0

17 (27)

0

Chills

10 (15)

0

17 (27)

0

Dry skin

2 (3)

0

17 (27)

0

Upper respiratory tract infection

6 (9)

0

16 (25)

0

Hypokalemia

4 (6)

0

16 (25)

3 (5)

Seborrheic keratosis

1 (2)

0

15 (24)

1 (2)

Skin papilloma

0

0

15 (24)

0

Blurred vision

2 (3)

0

14 (22)

0

Abdominal pain

10 (15)

1 (2)

13 (21)

0

Constipation

10 (15)

1 (2)

13 (21)

0

Cough

6 (9)

0

13 (21)

0

Hypophosphatemia

3 (5)

3 (5)

13 (21)

6 (10)

Selected AESI, n (%)

Retinal detachment/retinopathy (grade ≥2)

a

0

0

3 (5)

0

Retinal vein occlusion (any grade)

0

0

0

0

QTc prolongation (grade ≥3)

a

— 2 (3)

— 4 (6)

cuSCC (any grade)

a

5 (8)

5 (8)

8 (13)

8 (13)

AESI, adverse events of special interest; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; cuSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma;

LFTs, liver function tests; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

a

Grouped terms.

t

0

Mutation

ersion 1.1

, tolerability

ition of the

ls

n

ks after

BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression-free survival; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

Median OS for BRAFi-naive patients increased from 31.2 months at 4 years’ follow-up

(data cutoff April 25, 2016)

8

to 31.8 onths at the latest data cutoff (July 10, 2017),

while landmark OS rates reached a plateau at 39.2% (

Figure 3

and

Table 3

)

Median OS for Vem-PD patients remained unchanged from previous reports at 8.5 months,

and landmark OS rates were stable

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves for OS in (A) Vem-PD patients and (B) BRAFi-naive

patients.

100

80

60

40

0

20

BRAFi-naive

63 60 55 48 44 39 33 28 22 18 17

10

1 —

5

16 11

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

OS, %

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

B

Events, n

34

Median OS, months (95% CI)

31.8 (24.5–NE)

+

BRAFi-naive (n = 63)

Censored

100

80

60

40

0

20

Vemurafenib

progressors

66 44 28 21 14 8

6 5

5 5

4

1

1 —

1

3 1

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

OS, %

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

A

Events, n

53

Median OS, months (95% CI)

8.5 (6.7–11.1)

+

Vemurafenib progressors (n = 66)

Censored

BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable; OS, overall survival; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

Constipati

Cough

Hypophos

Selected A

Retinal det

Retinal vei

QTc prolon

cuSCC (an

AESI, adverse e

LFTs, liver functi

a

Grouped terms

Table 6.

Tr

Treatment

Vem-PD p

Dose int

reductio

Permane

BRAFi-nai

Dose int

reductio

Permane

AE, adverse ev

¿Quiénes son estos pacientes?

¿Por qué no están el resto?

SMR 2017