Previous Page  36 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

Extended 5-Year Follow-up Results of a Phase 1b Study

(BRIM7) of Cobimetinib Combined With Vemurafenib in

BRAF

V600

-Mutated Melanoma

Adil Daud,

1

Anna C. Pavlick,

2

Antoni Ribas,

3

Rene Gonzalez,

4

Karl D. Lewis,

4

Omid Hamid,

5

Thomas F. Gajewski,

6

Igor Puzanov,

7

Jessie J. Hsu,

8

Isabelle Rooney,

8

Erica Park,

8

Grant A. McArthur

9

1

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;

2

New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA;

3

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA;

4

University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA;

5

The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA;

6

The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA;

7

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA;

8

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA;

9

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, and University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

INTRODUCTION

•

BRAF

V600

is the driver of a significant proportion of melanomas, and targeted inhibition of

MAPK signaling is effective in treating advanced melanoma

1,2

– However, relapses frequently occur due to re-activation of MAPK signaling through

acquired mutations in pathway components

3,4

•

Combining the BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) vemurafenib with the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib

has the potential to provide more effective tumor suppression

•

The phase Ib BRIM7 study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT01271803) evaluated the safety and

preliminary efficacy of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib

5

•

A subsequent randomized phase 3 trial showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful

improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of cobimetinib

combined with vemurafenib compared with vemurafenib alone

6

•

Extended follow-up of this study provides useful insights on the long-term safety and

efficacy of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib for patients with

BRAF

V600

-mutated

metastatic melanoma

OBJECTIVE

•

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib

after extended follow up in patients with

BRAF

V600

-mutated metastatic melanoma (data cutoff

July 10, 2017)

METHODS

Study Design

•

BRIM7 was an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b dose-escalation study conducted in

two stages (dose escalation and expansion)

•

In the dose-escalation stage, patients received cobimetinib at 60, 80, or 100 mg once daily

(QD) for 14 days on/14 days off (14/14); 21 days on/7 days off (21/7); or continuously (28/0),

combined with vemurafenib at 720 or 960 mg twice daily (BID) continuously (

Figure 1

)

•

Two dose levels were expanded: cobimetinib (60 mg QD 21/7) and vemurafenib (720 and

960 mg BID)

•

Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal

of consent

Figure 1.

Study design.

Cobimetinib 60 mg QD

21/7 days on/off

+

Vemurafenib 720 mg BID

28/0 days on/off

Cohort Expansion Stage

(2 cohorts)

Dose Escalation Stage

3 + 3 design (10 cohorts)

Follow-up Period

(2 cohorts)

Cobimetinib 60, 80, or

100 mg QD

14/14, 21/7, or

28/0 days on/off

+

Vemurafenib 720 or

960 mg BID

28/0 days on/off

All patients

Cobimetinib 60 mg QD

21/7 days on/off

+

Vemurafenib 960 mg BID

28/0 days on/off

Prior

treatment

with

vemurafenib

n = 66

No prior

BRAFi

treatment

n = 63

BID, twice daily; BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; QD, once daily.

Key Eligibility Criteria

Efficacy

•

Confirmed BORR in BRAFi-naive patients and in Vem-PD patients was unchanged from

previous reports

7,8

(

Table 2

)

Table 2.

Confirmed BORR in Each Cohort

Vem-PD

n = 66

BRAFi-Naive

n = 63

Objective response, % (95% CI)

15.2 (7.5–25.5)

87.3 (76.7–94.4)

Complete response

1.5

19.0

Partial response

13.6

68.3

Stable disease

42.4

9.5

Progressive disease

36.4

3.2

Not assessable/not done

6.0

0

BORR, best overall response rate; BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

•

Median PFS for Vem-PD and BRAFi-naive patients remained unchanged from previous

reports, at 2.8 months and 13.8 months, respectively (

Figure 2

)

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS in (A) Vem-PD patients and

(B) BRAFi-naive patients.

100

80

60

40

0

20

BRAFi-naive

63 55 42 32 26 20 16 14 13 12 9

4

2

8 5

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

B

Events, n

45

MedianPFS,months (95%CI)

13.8 (10.8–20.6)

+

BRAFi-naive (n = 63)

Censored

100

80

60

40

0

20

Vemurafenib

progressors

64 15 7

2

2 2

1 1

1 1 —

— —

— —

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

A

Events, n

61

MedianPFS,months (95%CI)

2.8 (2.6–3.4)

+

Vemurafenib progressors (n = 66)

Censored

PFS,%

PFS,%

BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression-free survival; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

•

Median OS for BRAFi-naive patients increased from 31.2 months at 4 years’ follow-up

(data cutoff April 25, 2016)

8

to 31.8 months at the latest data cutoff (July 10, 2017),

while landmark OS rates reached a plateau at 39.2% (

Figure 3

and

Table 3

)

•

Median OS for Vem-PD patients remained unchanged from previous reports at 8.5 months,

and landmark OS rates were stable

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves for OS in (A) Vem-PD patients and (B) BRAFi-naive

patients.

100

80

60

40

20

OS,%

A

Events, n

53

MedianOS,months (95%CI)

8.5 (6.7–11.1)

+

Vemurafenib progressors (n = 66)

Censored

Table 5.

Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Attribution, in ≥20% of

Safety-Evaluable Patients, and AESI, in BRIM7 at 5 Years

Common Treatment-EmergentAEs, n (%)

Vem-PD

n = 66

BRAFi-Naive

n = 63

Any

Grade

Grade

≥3

Any

Grade

Grade

≥3

Non-acneiform rash

a

25 (38)

1 (2)

56 (89)

9 (14)

Diarrhea

31 (47)

2 (3)

52 (83)

6 (10)

Fatigue

18 (27)

1 (2)

46 (73)

7 (11)

Photosensitivity

a

22 (33)

1 (2)

46 (73)

1 (2)

Elevations in LFTs

a

22 (33)

4 (6)

44 (70)

13 (21)

Nausea

23 (35)

2 (3)

37 (59)

2 (3)

Arthralgia

8 (12)

1 (2)

31 (49)

7 (11)

Vomiting

14 (21)

1 (2)

30 (48)

0

CPK level elevation

10 (15)

1 (2)

30 (48)

2 (3)

Pyrexia

11 (17)

1 (2)

28 (44)

1 (2)

Acneiform rash

a

9 (14)

1 (2)

28 (44)

2 (3)

Peripheral edema

11 (17)

0

27 (43)

0

Anemia

11 (17)

5 (8)

23 (37)

7 (11)

Blood creatinine increased

6 (9)

0

21 (33)

1 (2)

Myalgia

4 (6)

0

20 (32)

1 (2)

Headache

13 (20)

0

19 (30)

2 (3)

Pruritus

7 (11)

0

19 (30)

1 (2)

Hypertension

6 (9)

1 (2)

19 (30)

5 (8)

Actinic keratosis

3 (5)

0

19 (30)

0

Decreased appetite

14 (21)

0

17 (27)

0

Chills

10 (15)

0

17 (27)

0

Dry skin

2 (3)

0

17 (27)

0

Upper respiratory tract infection

6 (9)

0

16 (25)

0

Hypokalemia

4 (6)

0

16 (25)

3 (5)

Seborrheic keratosis

1 (2)

0

15 (24)

1 (2)

Skin papilloma

0

0

15 (24)

0

Blurred vision

2 (3)

0

14 (22)

0

Abdominal pain

10 (15)

1 (2)

13 (21)

0

Constipation

10 (15)

1 (2)

13 (21)

0

Cough

6 (9)

0

13 (21)

0

Hypophosphatemia

3 (5)

3 (5)

13 (21)

6 (10)

Selected AESI, n (%)

Retinal detachment/retinopathy (grade ≥2)

a

0

0

3 (5)

0

Retinal vein occlusion (any grade)

0

0

0

0

QTc prolongation (grade ≥3)

a

— 2 (3)

— 4 (6)

cuSCC (any grade)

a

5 (8)

5 (8)

8 (13)

8 (13)

AESI, adverse events of special interest; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; cuSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma;

LFTs, liver function tests; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

a

Grouped terms.

t

0

Mutation

ersion 1.1

, tolerability

ition of the

ls

n

ks after

BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression-free survival; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

•

Median OS for BRAFi-naive patients increased from 31.2 months at 4 years’ follow-up

(data cutoff April 25, 2016)

8

to 31.8 onths at the latest data cutoff (July 10, 2017),

while landmark OS rates reached a plateau at 39.2% (

Figure 3

and

Table 3

)

•

Median OS for Vem-PD patients remained unchanged from previous reports at 8.5 months,

and landmark OS rates were stable

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves for OS in (A) Vem-PD patients and (B) BRAFi-naive

patients.

100

80

60

40

0

20

BRAFi-naive

63 60 55 48 44 39 33 28 22 18 17

10

1 —

5

16 11

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

OS, %

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

B

Events, n

34

Median OS, months (95% CI)

31.8 (24.5–NE)

+

BRAFi-naive (n = 63)

Censored

100

80

60

40

0

20

Vemurafenib

progressors

66 44 28 21 14 8

6 5

5 5

4

1

1 —

1

3 1

1

9 5

13

21

29

37

45

53

61

17

25

33

41

49

57

65

OS, %

No. of Patients at Risk

Time, Months

A

Events, n

53

Median OS, months (95% CI)

8.5 (6.7–11.1)

+

Vemurafenib progressors (n = 66)

Censored

BRAFi, BRAF inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable; OS, overall survival; Vem-PD, vemurafenib progressor.

Constipati

Cough

Hypophos

Selected A

Retinal det

Retinal vei

QTc prolon

cuSCC (an

AESI, adverse e

LFTs, liver functi

a

Grouped terms

Table 6.

Tr

Treatment

Vem-PD p

Dose int

reductio

Permane

BRAFi-nai

Dose int

reductio

Permane

AE, adverse ev

¿Quiénes son estos pacientes?

¿Por qué no están el resto?

SMR 2017