Previous Page  9 / 27 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 27 Next Page
Page Background

Figure 2. Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status and Key Clinical Subgroups

Kaplan-Meier plot of OS

A

0

100

80

60

40

20

0

45

42

39

36

33

30

27

24

21

18

15

12

9 6 3

OS, %

9

9

5

5

95

50

72

39

56

33

46

29

37

22

34

21

29

19

26

19

25

19

23

19

21

19

16

14

13

11

1-Year OS: 45%

2-Year OS: 31%

3-Year OS: 27%

1-Year OS: 51%

1-Year OS: 40%

2-Year OS: 44%

2-Year OS: 16%

3-Year OS: 42%

3-Year OS: 10%

Time, mo

No. at risk

All patients

IC2/3

Median OS (95% CI), mo

All patients: 10.1 (7.3 to 17.0)

IC2/3: 14.6 (9.0 to NE)

IC0/1: 7.6 (4.7 to 13.9)

Research

Original Investigation

Atezolizumab Monotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

Figure 1. Duration of Treatment and Response in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Treated With Atezoli

PR

PR/PR

a

PR

1 y

2 y

3 y

Table 3. Objective Response Rates to Atezolizumab Treatment and Duration of Response

by Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemical Status

Parameter

IC0/1

(n = 44)

IC2/3

(n = 50)

All Patients

(N = 95)

a

Objective response rate (95% CI)

b

11 (4 to 25)

40 (26 to 55)

26 (18 to 36)

Best overall response, No. (%)

Complete response

1 (2)

8 (16)

9 (10)

Partial response

4 (9)

12 (24)

16 (17)

Stable disease

9 (21)

9 (18)

18 (19)

Progressive disease

24 (55)

17 (34)

42 (44)

No assessment

c

6 (14)

4 (8)

10 (11)

Duration of response, mo (range)

27.6 (6.2 to >34.3)

18.0 (2.8 to >41.0)

22.1 (2.8 to >41.0)

Atezolizumab Monotherapy for Pati nts With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

predicts outcome in metastatic

urothelial cancer treated with

atezolizumab

Petrylak, DP et al. JAMA Oncol 2018

N=95, Phase I atezolizumab in monotherapy

PD-L1 IC expression, SP142