Previous Page  6 / 27 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 27 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Kudo M

et al

.

Lancet

. 2018;pii:S0140-6736(18)30207–1

REFLECT TRIAL: Study Schema

BCLC = Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; BW = body weight; ECOG-PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; EHS = extrahepatic spread;

HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; MVI = macroscopic portal vein invasion; mRECIST = modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours; ORR = objective response rate; OS =

overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; PK = pharmacokinetic; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours;

TACE = trans-catheter arterial chemoembolisation; TTP = time to progression.

Global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority study

Stratification

§

Region:

(Asia-Pacific or

Western)

§

MVI and/or EHS:

(yes or no)

§

ECOG-PS: (0 or 1)

§

Body weight:

(<60 kg or ≥60 kg)

§

Primary

objective:

‒ OS

§

Secondary

objectives:

‒ PFS

‒ TTP

‒ ORR

‒ Quality of life

‒ PK lenvatinib

exposure

parameters

*

Tumour assessments were

performed according to

mRECIST by the investigator

Patients with

unresectable HCC

(N=954)

§

No prior systemic therapy

for unresectable HCC

§

≥ 1 measurable target lesion

per mRECIST

§

BCLC-B (not applicable for

TACE) or BCLC-C

§

Child-Pugh A

§

ECOG-PS ≤1

§

Adequate organ function

§

Patients with ≥50% liver

occupation, clear bile duct

invasion, or portal vein

invasion at the main portal

vein were excluded

Lenvatinib

(N=478)

8 mg (BW <60 kg) or

12 mg (BW ≥60 kg)

once daily

Sorafenib

(n = 476)

400 mg

twice daily

Randomisation 1:1