16 / 40
Meta-analysis:
Impacto de ETS en Resección
Taieb J, et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018;144:321-35
Meta-analysis of overall resection data also favoured ETS ≥ 20% vs ETS < 20% (odds
ratio = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21‒0.63). Weight is relative weight (%) from the fixed-effects
models. logOR, log odds ratio; logSE, standard error of logOR.
Favours
ETS ≥ 30%
Favours
ETS < 30%
Heterogeneity: Chi
2
= 1.27, df = 2, (P = 0.53), I
2
= 0%, Tau
2
= 0
PEAK
PLANET
PRIME
Total
(Fixed)
Odds ratio (95% CI)logOR
logSE Weight
Total
(Random)
0.37 (0.21‒0.66)
0.59 (0.24‒1.50)
0.25 (0.070‒0.91)
0.40 (0.25‒0.63)
0.40 (0.25‒0.63)
‒0.990
‒0.522
‒1.39
0.2945
0.4715
0.6571
62.9
24.5
12.6
100.0
0.1
1
10
Meta-analysis of overall resection data favoured Week 8 ETS ≥ 30% vs < 30%
WT RAS