Previous Page  30 / 42 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 42 Next Page
Page Background

Population PFS HR (95% CI)

n (%)

bTMB ≥4

0.89 (0.73, 1.08)

441 (76%)

bTMB ≥6

0.83 (0.67, 1.03)

371 (64%)

bTMB ≥8

0.79 (0.62, 1.00)

302 (52%)

bTMB ≥10

0.73 (0.56, 0.95)

251 (43%)

bTMB ≥12

0.73 (0.54, 0.97)

211 (36%)

bTMB ≥14

0.68 (0.50, 0.92)

188 (32%)

bTMB ≥16

0.65 (0.47, 0.92)

158 (27%)

bTMB ≥18

0.66 (0.46, 0.95)

136 (23%)

bTMB ≥20

0.61 (0.40, 0.93)

105 (18%)

bTMB ≥22

0.57 (0.35, 0.91)

84 (14%)

bTMB ≥24

0.54 (0.32, 0.91)

69 (12%)

bTMB ≥26

0.51 (0.28, 0.95)

54 (9%)

BEP

0.87 (0.73, 1.04)

583 (100%)

ITT

0.95 (0.82, 1.10)

850

Population OS HR (95% CI)

n (%)

bTMB ≥4

0.70 (0.57, 0.87)

441 (76%)

bTMB ≥6

0.71 (0.56, 0.90)

371 (64%)

bTMB ≥8

0.70 (0.54, 0.91)

302 (52%)

bTMB ≥10

0.69 (0.52, 0.93)

251 (43%)

bTMB ≥12

0.68 (0.50, 0.94)

211 (36%)

bTMB ≥14

0.66 (0.47, 0.92)

188 (32%)

bTMB ≥16

0.64 (0.44, 0.92)

158 (27%)

bTMB ≥18

0.61 (0.41, 0.90)

136 (23%)

bTMB ≥20

0.65 (0.41, 1.03)

105 (18%)

bTMB ≥22

0.67 (0.40, 1.13)

84 (14%)

bTMB ≥24

0.53 (0.30, 0.94)

69 (12%)

bTMB ≥26

0.50 (0.27, 0.95)

54 (9%)

BEP

0.64 (0.53, 0.77)

583 (100%)

ITT

0.73 (0.62, 0.87)

850

Enrichment of PFS benefit was observed in the blood-based TMB (bTMB) ≥16 subgroup, while OS was consistent between the bTMB ≥16 subgroup and

the BEP

30

Subgroups in OAK

Progression-Free Survival

Overall Survival

0.2

1.0

HR

1.5

Favors atezolizumab Favors docetaxel

0.2

1.0

HR

1.5

Favors atezolizumab Favors docetaxel

BEP=biomarker-evaluable population.

Gandara DR et al.

Nat Med

. 2018;24(9):1441-1448.

Gandara et al., 2018,

Nat Med

.