Previous Page  21 / 27 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 27 Next Page
Page Background

Data from SELECT study

show better results in first-line

n (%)

Lenvatinib (n=261)

Placebo (n=131)

Secondary efficacy endpoints

ORR, n (%)

169 (64.8)

2 (1.5)

Complete response

4 (1.5)

0

Partial response

165 (63.2)

2 (1.5)

Stable disease

60 (23.0)

71 (54.2)

Stable disease ≥23 weeks

40 (15.3)

39 (29.8)

Progressive disease

18 (6.9)

52 (39.7)

Could not be evaluated

14 (5.4)

6 (4.6)

Exploratory efficacy endpoints

Median time to first objective

response, months

2.0

5.6

Disease control rate*, no (%)

229 (87.7)

73 (55.7)

Clinical benefit rate

, no (%)

209 (80.1)

41 (31.3)

Lenvatinib achieved a 65% ORR in 1L compared with 52% in 2L,

including a 1.5% complete response rate ALL in 1L Patients

Schlumberger M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:621–630.