Previous Page  14 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Hoyle, et al. Effects of AA + P in high and

low risk mHSPC

Hypotesis:

Do “low risk “ mHNPC patients benefit from AA + P + ADT?

Methods:

1. Retrospectively stratified M1 Stampede “Abiraterone comparison” patients into high/low risk, blinded to treatment arm:

1. Primary stratification as per Latitude criteria

2. Exploratory stratification as per Chaarted criteria

2. Analyse “risk” and “volume” base data against multiple measured endpoints

Patient selection

Standard of care (SOC) was ADT.

Population

Number

(%)

LATTITUDE low 428 (47.5)

LATTITUDE high 473 (52.5)

CHAARTED low 402 (44.6)

CHAARTED high 499 (55.4)

Inclusion criteria (n=1917)

Metastatic disease (de-novo or previous radical treatment

Randomisation into STAMPEDE within UK

Nov 2011 and Jan 2014

ADT or ADT + AA + P

Included STAMPEDE M1 patients

(n=990)

SOC-only

n=497

Excluded

(n=45)

Missing Gleason score n=12

Unobtained bone imaging n=24

Unconventional bone imaging n=9

Excluded

(n=44)

Missing Gleason score n=22

Unobtained bone imaging n=17

Unconventional bone imaging n=5

Not Evaluated (n=927)

Non-metastatic (M0) patients

(n=914)

Or

Randomized in Switzerland

(n=13)

SOC

(n=452)

SOC + ADT + AA + P

n=493

SOC + ADT + AA + P

(n=449)

Hoyle, et al. Effects of AA + P in high and

low risk mHSPC

Hypotesis:

Do “low risk “ mHNPC patients benefit from AA + P + ADT?

Methods:

1. Retrospectively stratified M1 Stampede “Abiraterone comparison” patients into high/low risk, blinded to treatment

1. Primary stratification as per Latitude criteria

2. Exploratory stratification as per Chaarted criteria

2. Analyse “risk” and “volume” base data against multiple

asured endpoints

Hoyle AP, et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29(Suppl 8):LBA4.

Patient selection

Standard of care (SOC) was ADT.

Population

N

(

LATTITUDE low 4

LATTITUDE high 4

CHAARTED low 4

CHAARTED high 4

Inclusion criteria (n=1917)

Metastatic disease (de-novo or previous radical treatment

Randomisation into STAMPEDE within UK

Nov 2011 and Jan 2014

ADT or ADT + AA + P

Included STAMPEDE M1 patients

(n=990)

SOC-only

n=497

Excluded

(n=45)

Missing Gleason score n=12

Unobtained bone imaging n=24

Unconventional bone imaging n=9

Excluded

(n=44)

Missing Gleason score n=22

Unobtained bone imaging n=17

Unconventional bone imaging n=5

Not Evaluated (n=927)

Non-metastatic (M0) patients

(n=914)

Or

Randomized in Switzerland

(n=13)

SOC

(n=452)

SOC + ADT + AA + P

n=493

SOC + ADT + AA + P

(n=449)