Previous Page  29 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

MAIN EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Prior

systemic

treatment

for

MUM.

Prior treatment with any drug specifically targeting T-

cell costimulation.

Active CNS metastases.

NIVO (1 mg/kg, iv, q3

weeks) and 4 doses of IPI (3

mg/kg iv q3 weeks) followed

by NIVO (3 mg/kg q2 weeks)

STUDY DESIGN

MAIN

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Histologically confirmed MUM not suitable for radical

treatment, age ≥18 years old, ECOG 0-1, measurable

disease by CT or MRI as per RECIST 1.1. Adequate

haematologic/organ function.

P

rogression disease

T

oxicity

Consent W

ithdrawal

Primary endpoint: To determine the efficacy, in terms of overall

survival (OS) at 12 months, after starting treatment with

nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in patients with

metastatic

uveal

melanoma.

Secondary endpoints:

Evaluate the safety profile,

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR)

(According

the

RECIST

criteria

1.1).

Phase 2 study of nivolumab

combined with ipilimumab in

subjects with previously

untreated metastatic uveal

melanoma.

ENDPOINTS

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma (UM) accounts for 0.1% of cancer-related deaths. Liver disease is the most common finding. Life expectancy is

reduced (<9 months) and chemotherapy seems not to improve overall survival (OS). Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has showed

efficacy in metastatic skin melanoma, but to date no evidence on metastatic UM (MUM) is available.

JM Piulats

et al.

ESMO 2017