Previous Page  45 / 59 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 59 Next Page
Page Background

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival as a Clinically

Meaningful End Point in Metastatic Castration-Resistant

Prostate Cancer

The PREVAIL Randomized Clinical Trial

Dana E. Rathkopf, MD; Tomasz M. Beer, MD; Yohann Loriot, MD, PhD; Celestia S. Higano, MD; Andrew J. Armstrong, MD, ScM; Cora N. Sternberg, MD;

Johann S. de Bono, MB ChB, PhD; Bertrand Tombal, MD, PhD; Teresa Parli, MD; Suman Bhattacharya, PhD; De Phung, BSc; Andrew Krivoshik, MD, PhD;

Howard I. Scher, MD; Michael J. Morris, MD

IMPORTANCE

Drug development for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has been

limited by a lack of clinically relevant trial end points short of overall survival (OS).

Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as defined by the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials

Working Group 2 (PCWG2) is a candidate end point that represents a clinically meaningful

benefit to patients.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the robustness of the PCWG2 definition and to examine the

relationship between rPFS and OS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

PREVAIL was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind,

placebo-controlled multinational study that enrolled 1717 chemotherapy-naive men with

metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from September 2010 through September

2012. The data were analyzed in November 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg or placebo until

Supplemental content

Research

JAMA Oncology |

Original Investigation

own right is essential to ensure the timely development of COU-AA-302 trial alsodemonstrateda correlati

Table 2. Correlation of Radiogr phic Progr ssion-Free Survival With Overall Survival

a

Method

Correlation (95% CI)

Total

(N = 1717)

Enzalutamide

(n = 872)

Placebo

(n = 845)

Spearman ρ

0.72 (0.67-0.76)

0.89 (0.86-0.92)

0.53 (0.43-0.61)

Kendall τ

0.53 (0.49-0.57)

0.72 (0.68-0.77)

0.37 (0.30-0.44)

a

The analysis da

September 16,

100

80

60

40

20

0

rPFS, %

0

3

6

9

12

21

18

Time, mo

15

No. at risk

Enzalutamide

Placebo

832

801

513

335

259

109

128

33

34

9

4

0

1

0

0

0

100

80

60

40

20

0

rPFS, %

0

3

6

9

12

Time, mo

No. at risk

Enzalutamide

Placebo

832

801

515

339

262

116

131

37

37

10

All intention-to-treat population; data cutoff, May 6, 2012.

rPFS MAY PREDICT OS

Rathkopf DE, et al. JAMA Oncol 2018;4(5):694-701