Previous Page  20 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

How does ARCHER 1050 compare with other

1L trials of 2

nd

& 3

rd

Gen EGFR TKI

LUX-Lung 7

1

ARCHER 1050

2

FLAURA

3

Median OS

27.9 m v 24.5 m

34.1 m v 26.8 m

Immature

Phase

IIb (n=319)

III (n=452)

III (n=556)

Arms

Afatinib vs gefitinib

Dacomitinib vs gefitinib

Osimertinib vs gefitinib/erlotinib

RR

70% v 56%

75% v 71.2%

80% v 76%

PFS (all comers)

11 m v 10.9 m (BIRC)

HR 0.73 (0.57 – 0.95) p=0.017

14.7 m v 9.2 m (BIRC) [No BM]

HR 0.59 (0.47-0.74) p<0.0001

17.7 m v 9.7 m (BIRC)

HR 0.45 (0.36 – 0.57) p<0.001

PFS (no brain mets)

19.1 m v 10.9 m (INV)

HR 0.46 (0.36-0.59) p<0.001

Park TLO 2016; Mok ASCO 2018; Soria NEJM 2018